The Jewish Humanist, October 1976, Vol. 14, Number 2
Sukkot begins Friday, October 8.
Sukkot is a harvest festival, a farmers’ holiday. It celebrates an experience which our ancestors tasted annually when they lived as a nation in ancient Palestine.
Today Sukkot is a vicarious experience for the vast majority of Jews. It celebrates what urban Jews no longer taste. The harvest is something we understand and value. But it is not a primary event in our life cycle.
For the contemporary Jew Sukkot is an expression of our attachment to our roots. It is an expression of our nostalgic attachment to the land where we began. The fruit harvest of Israel is important to us because Israel is important to us.
Modern Israel, however, is radically different from ancient Israel. The secular founders of the Jewish state not only ignored Yahveh. They also ignored all other gods. Although they succeeded in bringing large numbers of Jews back to the land, they also created an industrial state where the overwhelming majority of Israelis are urban and capitalist consumers.
In one respect modern Israel is like ancient Palestine. The Hebrews who invaded the land found a nation already living there. That nation was the people of Canaan. The Canaanites were West Semitic brothers of the Hebrews who had lived in Palestine long before the Hebrew federation had come into being.
Even though the pious and fanatic editors of the Bible resisted the truth, the fact is that the Hebrews were unable to subdue and destroy all the Canaanites. They lived side by side with them for many centuries and shared the land. The prophets found this association offensive because they thought it was subversive of the purity of the Yahvistic religion. Many political leaders found this connection disgusting because they preferred the military strength of a homogeneous population. But they were forced to accept reality. Extermination of the natives was both unmoral (sic) and dangerous. The danger lay in the fact that the Canaanites had relatives living outside of Israel who would have been provoked by such action. These relatives were called Phoenicians by the Greeks.
Modern Israel also shares the land with another nation, which has powerful relatives outside its borders. The Arabs are the modern Canaanites. Although Jews and Arabs hate each other they are forced to live together on the same piece of real estate.
In Greater Israel (post 1967 Israel) almost 40% of the population is Arab. Most of these Arabs are without political and civil rights. Four hundred thousand Arabs are Israeli citizens, residents of the old Israel. One million Arabs are without citizenship, residents of Gaza, Judea and Samaria.
These Arabs will not go away. They can no longer be expelled. Even if all Palestinian refugees are forbidden to return, they will remain a large minority of the Israeli population. If their birth rate persists, they will eventually become the majority.
Only two situations can reverse this reality. (1) Israel returns Judea, Samaria and Gaza to their former Arab owners. (2) Thousands of European and American Jews immigrate to Israel.
Neither situation is likely.
The Israeli government cannot return the occupied territories to Jordan or Egypt. To do so would be to re-create (sic) the old indefensible boundaries of…. (pages 3-4 missing from journal)